CASE 14288 Published on 08.05.2017

Ulnar nerve schwannoma

Section

Musculoskeletal system

Case Type

Clinical Cases

Authors

M. Villalta-Santamaria, E. Llopis.

Hospital Universitario de La Ribera,
Alzira, Valencia, Spain;
Email:marcosvillsan@gmail.com
Patient

47 years, female

Categories
Area of Interest Neuroradiology peripheral nerve ; Imaging Technique MR
Clinical History
A 47-year-old woman presented to our outpatient clinic with a soft elastic mass in the medial aspect of the right arm that had been progressively enlarging during the last 4 years. The patient referred no trauma history and clinical examination revealed 4th and 5th finger hypoesthesia.
Imaging Findings
An MRI examination was performed using a 1.5T scanner. The study consisted of T1-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE), T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) with fat saturation and gradient echo T2 (FFE) sequences performed in the axial, coronal and sagittal planes, followed by post Gd dynamic and FSE T1 WI study.
The MRI study showed a fusiform-shaped mass in the medial aspect of the right arm close to the basilic vein in contact with the ulnar nerve. On T1-WI the mass was homogeneous and intermediate signal intensity and hyperintense and slightly heterogeneous on T2-WI fat saturation. After gadolinium injection the images showed avid and diffuse enhancement except non-enhancement central area.
Surgical resection followed with pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of schwannoma.
Discussion
Schwannomas are rare tumours but still the most common primary nerve sheath tumours of the upper limb, accounting for about 5% of all benign soft-tissue neoplasms. The most commonly affected peripheral nerves are the peroneal and the ulnar nerves. [1, 3]

Schwannomas are well-encapsulated benign tumours. Microscopically, schwannoma combines highly ordered cellular component and hypocellular loose myxoid component, Antoni A and Antoni B areas respectively. Tumour cells are highly inmunopositive for S-100 protein.
MRI is the best imaging modality for diagnosing nerve sheath tumours, however, sometimes the differential diagnosis from other soft tissue tumours is difficult if they do not have specific signs. [1, 2]

The most reliable sign for schwannoma is its localization in continuity (eccentrically) with a normal nerve. MR characteristic features show iso to slightly increased signal intensity relative to muscle on T1WI, a thin peripheral rim of fat (split-fat sign) is very characteristic and may have subtle muscle atrophy distal to lesion. On fluid-sensitive sequences schwannomas are hyperintense to muscle and may show a typical central low signal region (target sign) and multiple small ring-like structures (fascicular sign). Diffuse intense enhancement is typical. [1, 2]
Differentiating on imaging between schwannomas and neurofibromas may be impossible. However, schwannomas are more likely to contain cysts, haemorrhage, fibrosis or calcification. Neurofibromas might have target sign and central enhancement on MRI. The differential diagnosis with malignant peripheral nerve tumours (MPNT) is difficult. MPNT is usually a larger (>5 cm) ill-defined mass located more frequently at the sciatic nerve, brachial and sacral plexus. Heterogeneous on T1-WI, T2-WI and intense and especially peripheral enhancement. MPNT are more likely to produce pain and sensory deficit. [2]

Since the malignancy rate and recurrence are very low, resection of the tumour is recommended.
Differential Diagnosis List
Ulnar nerve schwannoma
Neurofibroma
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour
Synovial sarcoma
Haematoma
Melanotic schwannoma
Final Diagnosis
Ulnar nerve schwannoma
Case information
URL: https://eurorad.org/case/14288
DOI: 10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.14288
ISSN: 1563-4086
License