CASE 14479 Published on 27.03.2017

Lost gallstones disguised as intraabdominal abscesses - percutaneous drainage with US

Section

Interventional radiology

Case Type

Clinical Cases

Authors

Teiga, Eduardo; Aguilar Guadalupe; Burdio, Fernando; Zugazaga, Ander; Sanchez, Juan; Bazan, Fernando; Radosevic, Aleksandar

Hospital Universitario del Mar; Passeig Maritim 08005 Barcelona, Spain; Email:eduardo_teiga@hotmail.com
Patient

65 years, male

Categories
Area of Interest Abdomen ; Imaging Technique CT, Ultrasound
Clinical History
A 65-year-old male presents to the emergency room with exacerbation of the epigastric and right upper quadrant pain he has been suffering from for 2 years following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. No nausea, vomiting, or fever were present. On physical examination an epigastric mass was palpable. Laparoscopic scars showed no signs of complications. Blood workup: normal leukocyte count.
Imaging Findings
CT showed two round and hypodense abdominal lesions (one supraumbilical and located in the peritoneal fat and the other subihepatic), with well-defined borders and a thickened wall. Findings prompted US examination.

US proved the two lesions to be anechoic and showed the presence of stones within.

Comparison with previous CT and US examinations revealed growth and formation of liquid within the abovementioned lesions.

Given the medical history of cholecystectomy with intraoperative gallbladder rupture, the findings were suspicious of granulomas related to gallstone spillage.

The radiological findings warranted percutaneous drainage with combined gallstones extraction. Punctures were performed with progressive dilatations up to a diameter of 20 Fr. A tube was placed and purulent outflow obtained. The cavity was instilled with abundant saline solution and the gallstones extracted with vacuum aspiration. Shortly after the procedure the patient became asymptomatic. Follow-up CT showed an almost complete resolution of the collections and no gallbladder stones left.
Discussion
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for symptomatic gallstones. However,
there are two problems that arise more commonly than in open cholecystectomy: injury to the common bile duct and complications from lost gallstones [1].

Spillage of gallstones commonly occurs, with an estimated incidence of 0.1–20%. Stones may remain in the peritoneal cavity adjacent to the liver or migrate to distant sites. In the majority of cases they cause no symptoms and remain benign. Complications are reported to occur in 0.08%–0.3% of patients. Every effort should be made to retrieve the stones in case of spillage in view of the risk of developing important complications. Abscess represents the most common complication. Retained gallstones have also presented after erosion through the skin, as a colovesical fistula, with expectoration (cholelithoptysis) and as the cause of an incarcerated hernia [2].

The reason why only a few patients develop such complications remains uncertain. Risk factors include acute cholecystitis with infected bile, spillage of pigment stones, multiple stones (15 stones), stone size (1.5cm), and age. The time gap after surgery for the clinical manifestations to occur varies from as short as one month to as long as 20 years, with an estimated peak incidence around four months. In most instances the immune mechanisms cope and lead to spontaneous resolution. Often the patients presenting with an abscess can be afebrile and have a normal white cell count [3].

Spilled gallstones appear on ultrasound examination as small hyperechoic lesions that may be related to fluid collections and are found most often in the subdiaphragmatic or subhepatic spaces. Radio-opaque calcified stones can be clearly seen on CT. On MRI most stones are hypo-intense on T2-weighted images and iso-intense to hyperintense on T1-weighted images. These are best seen without fat suppression. Sometimes the radiological findings mimic unusual diagnoses such as actinomycosis, hydatid disease or even malignancy, so diagnosis can be challenging. Ultimately, abscesses should be drained, whether percutaneously or surgically, and the stones should eventually be removed. Ideally this is done via minimally invasive techniques, but open surgery is often required [4].

In conclusion, the advent of an unexplained intraabdominal abscess in a patient who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the past, even if surgery was performed many years ago, should lead to the differential diagnosis of spilled stones even if rupture of the gallbladder was not evident during the procedure. Our case illustrates how percutaneous image-guided techniques can successfully resolve this complication and avoid surgery.
Differential Diagnosis List
Gallstone-Related Abdominal Abscesses After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Malignancy
Spontaneous Abscess
Final Diagnosis
Gallstone-Related Abdominal Abscesses After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Case information
URL: https://eurorad.org/case/14479
DOI: 10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.14479
ISSN: 1563-4086
License