CASE 16151 Published on 08.11.2018

Perforation of transverse colon by a fish bone: a rare reaching

Section

Abdominal imaging

Case Type

Clinical Cases

Authors

Anna Favia1*, Annalisa Ambrosi2*, Valentina Grimaldi2*, Vito Modesto3*, Paola D’Aprile2*

1*Aldo Moro University of Bari , Polyclinic of Bari, Radiology Department, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, Bari, 70124 Italy;Email:annafavia@libero.it
2*Saint Paul Hospital, Department of Radiology, Bari, 70132 Italy;
3*Saint Paul Hospital, Department of Surgery, Bari, 70132 Italy.
Patient

62 years, female

Categories
Area of Interest Abdomen ; Imaging Technique CT, Image manipulation / Reconstruction
Clinical History
A 62-years-old female presented to our Emergency and Accident Department with an history of 24-hours severe abdominal pain. No fever, no vomiting or diarrhea. At the physical examination, there was a diffuse abdominal tenderness. Lab results showed leukocytosis (17.000/ml) and elevated CRP (230 mg/ml ). Abdominal CT was performed.
Imaging Findings
At basal scan CT, a high density linear shadow about 30 mm in diameter was shown in a hypodense formation in the center-abdominal region (Figure 1). In the arterious phase scan, the lesion showed an uniform and linear parietal enhancement, to be referred to an abscess cavity, containing the foreign calcified body, immediately below the transverse colon (Figures 2-3); in addition, there were multiple peri-centimetric lymph nodes, most represented at the lumbar-aortic level. The CT-phases with contrast confirmed also the presence of dense streaks in the peri-visceral adipose tissue, in correspondence of the transverse colon (Figure 4); there were no obvious signs of pneumoperitoneum.
CT findings indicated a perforation of transverse colon by a radiopaque foreign body, complicated with abscess. The patient has been subjected to laparotomy with exeresis of the abscess highlighted to the CT, originated by a fish bone that determinated a covered perforation of transverse colon (Figures 5a-b).
Discussion
The ingestion of a foreign body, especially fish bone, is common. However, bowel perforation by foreign body is a rare reaching (less than 1 %) [1] and it occurs usually at ileum and recto-sigmoid junction [2] Other important complications related to the ingestion of foreign body can include obstruction and bleeding.[3].
Clinically, the perforation of the gastrointestinal tract from ingestion of a foreign body occurs as other causes of acute abdominal pain, in particular, the mode of onset is similar to other pathologies that may require surgical treatment such as appendicitis, diverticulitis or may present with symptomatology that mimics the hepatic abscess [ 1, 4] The intestinal perforation by a foreign body, unlike other causes, is rarely associated with the presence of pneumoperitoneum, as it is characterized by the progressive intention of the organism to minimize the perforation through the approaching of adjacent intestinal loops and the possible formation of an abscess. [1, 4]
The role of imaging is fundamental for the diagnosis of perforation by foreign body, in particular to identify and to localize the intestinal perforation, along the identification of the cause (it can be due to trauma, diverticula, obstruction, carcinoma or foreign body). Through the CT examination, it is also possible to provide the surgeon with all the anatomical information and the necessary elements for the type of surgical intervention.
The possible therapeutic options for intestinal perforation by a foreign body are conservative (broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy) or surgical (removal of abscess). [5] The mode of clinical presentation, especially if the onset is acute, together with the findings on CT imaging, determine the therapeutic pathway to be taken. The prognosis of this clinical condition is linked to patient factors (such as performance status), to the foreign body nature (and its related complication), the timeliness of diagnosis and the type of treatment. [6, 7].
Conclusions: despite the rarity of this clinical finding, the possibility of a foreign body ingestion should be considered in diagnosis of colon perforation.

‘Written informed patient consent for publication has been obtained’
Differential Diagnosis List
Transverse colon covered perforation, with abscess; diagnosis confirmed on surgery
Neoplasm
Colic intussusception
Enteritis
Final Diagnosis
Transverse colon covered perforation, with abscess; diagnosis confirmed on surgery
Case information
URL: https://eurorad.org/case/16151
DOI: 10.1594/EURORAD/CASE.16151
ISSN: 1563-4086
License