Neuroradiology
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors
Filip Vujevic1, Gordana Ivanac1,2, Eugen Divjak1, Luka Pfeifer1, Boris Brkljacic1,2
Patient45 years, female
A 45-year-old patient without any significant medical or family history was referred to our radiology department by the plastic surgeon due to paraesthesia in her left arm and rapidly growing palpable painful mass in her left axillary region during last two months.
Ultrasound (US) examination showed a round, hypoechoic lesion with increased vascularity due to feeding arteries arising directly from the posteriorly positioned axillar artery (Fig.1).
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the left axillary region showed expansile mass lesion attached to the medial cord of the brachial plexus that was hyperintense on T1-TIRM images (Fig.2), heterogeneous on T2-weighted images (Fig.3) and showed restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (Fig.4). After intravenous contrast administration, the lesion showed heterogeneous postcontrast enhancement (Fig.5).
Surgical extirpation of the tumour was performed. Immunohistochemically, the lesion was definitely characterised as a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST).
MPNSTs are malignant tumours derived from Schwann cells or Schwann cell precursors surrounding peripheral nerves that account for 5-10% of all soft tissue sarcomas with an incidence rate of 0,001% in the general population [1,2]. MPNSTs may emerge from neurofibroma, therefore making neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) one of the main risk factors for developing MPNSTs [3]. However, many cases of MPNSTs arise sporadically or due to radiation exposure [4]. The location is most commonly in extremities and their most common metastatic sites are lungs [2,5].
The clinical manifestation of MPNT is classical of soft tissue sarcomas with symptoms such as enlarging mass, pain, skeletal muscle weakness, paraesthesia, and neurologic deficits [6].
Computed tomography (CT) and US have a limited role in the diagnostic work-up, therefore making MRI the main modality to characterise the topographic relationship of the tumour to the adjacent tissues, such as blood vessels and other vital structures, so radiologist’s report should note whether tumour infiltrates any of these structures or not [7, 8]. MRI characteristics of MPNSTs are varyingly present. Imaging features highly suggestive for malignancy include larger size, an ill-defined margin of the mass, lack of contiguity with adjacent specific nerves, and MR signal changes in adjacent soft tissue [9]. However, because the MRI cannot effectively confirm malignant transformation of lesions, histopathologic examination remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of MPNTs [6]. Nevertheless, conventional MRI may obviate the need for biopsies in presence of imaging features suggestive of a benign lesion, such as the T2-hypointensity in the central area of the mass and T2-hyperintense rim, so-called “target sign”, and absence of ill-defined margins or perilesional oedema. However, “target sign” is not sufficiently specific or sensitive as it is also encountered in some malignant lesions. Therefore, cystic changes, heterogeneity on T1-weighted images and intratumoral lobulation are also supposed to be taken into consideration [3, 10]. Surgical removal remains the main treatment for MPNST, whilst adjuvant therapies are recommended for patients with MPNST, specifically for those with positive margins [11]. MPNST has the highest local recurrence rate among sarcomas and 5-year survival remains poor in general [11].
Written informed patient consent for publication has been obtained.
[1] Adam D Durbin et al. “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors”. In:
[2] Cancer and Zebrafish (2016), pp. 495–530. (PMID: 27165368)
[3] Samer Abdel Al et al. “Fungating malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor arising from a slow-growing mass in the forearm: a case report and review of the literature”. In: Journal of Medical Case Reports 14.1 (2020), pp. 1–7. (PMID: 32631436)
[4] Enrico Martin et al. “A Bayesian approach for diagnostic accuracy of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: a systematic review and meta- analysis”. In: Neurooncology 23.4 (2021), pp. 557–571. (PMID: 33326583)
[5] Teddy Mohamad, Camille Plante, and Jean-Philippe Brosseau. “Toward Understanding the Mechanisms of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Development”. In: International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22.16 (2021), p. 8620. (PMID: 34445326)
[6] Barbara S Ducatman et al. “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinicopathologic study of 120 cases”. In: Cancer 57.10 (1986), pp. 2006– 2021. (PMID: 3082508)
[7] Aaron W James et al. “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor”. In:
[8] Surgical Oncology Clinics 25.4 (2016), pp. 789–802. (PMID: 27591499)
[9] A Chhabra et al. “The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic evaluation of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors”. In: Indian journal of cancer 48.3 (2011), p. 328. (PMID: 21921333)
[10] Gaurav Gupta and Allen Maniker. “Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors”. In: Neurosurgical focus 22.6 (2007), pp. 1–8. (PMID: 17613203)
[11] Chao-Shiang Li et al. “Differentiation of soft tissue benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors with magnetic resonance imaging”. In: Clinical imaging 32.2 (2008), pp. 121–127. (PMID: 18313576)
[12] Bhargava R, Parham DM, Lasater OE et-al. MR imaging differentiation of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: use of the target sign. Pediatr Radiol. 1997;27 (2): 124-9. (PMID: 9028843)
[13] Zhenyu Cai et al. “Prognosis and risk factors for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. In: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 18.1 (2020), pp. 1–12. (PMID: 32998743)
URL: | https://eurorad.org/case/17630 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.17630 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.