Musculoskeletal system
Case TypeClinical Cases
Authors
Siri Chandana Mamillapalli, Vadlapally Karuna, Husha Priya Laasya Bolla, Tata Venkata Pavan Kumar Gupta, Sai Krishna Sujith Naidu
Patient51 years, female
A 51-year-old female came to Orthopedic Out Patient Department with complaints of pain and swelling in her left forearm for one month.
Plain radiograph
Well-defined lytic lesion in the proximal 1/3rd of the radius with a rim of sclerosis, focal cortical defect in the dorsal aspect, and associated with adjacent soft tissue swelling.
Computed tomography
Hypodense lesion with fatty attenuation (Average attenuation of -120HU) in the proximal shaft of the radius with a cortical defect measuring 7mm in the posterior aspect and extension of the lesion into intermuscular planes.
MRI
Well-defined intramedullary lesion in the proximal 1/3rd of the radius, which is hyperintense on T1 & T2 images. Loss of signal in fat suppression sequence (STIR). Cortical defect in the postero-lateral aspect through which the lesion is seen extending into the intermuscular planes pushing adjacent muscles laterally and neurovascular bundle medially. The intermuscular component of the lesion is measuring 5.3x 4.6 x 3.7 cm (Craniocaudal x Transverse x Anteroposterior) with thin internal septations (thickness 3mm) and no evidence of a solid component. Constellation of above-mentioned findings indicates, it is a stage 1 lipoma.
Background
Intraosseous lipomas are one of the rarest benign soft tissue tumours, accounting for only 0.1% of all primary osseous tumours [4] with histologically identical tissue to adipose fat. Lipomas in general occur at a rate of up to 2.1 per 100 people [1], whilst the incidence of intraosseous lipomas is significantly lower than this. They can be subcutaneous or in the deeper planes like intermuscular, intramuscular, intraosseous, or intraglandular locations. They typically grow expansively between different fascial planes without infiltrating neighbouring structures, allowing them to be easily excised or aspirated with low recurrence rates. They have various stages of presentation due to their stages of evolution and can be mistaken for various osteolytic lesions [non-ossifying fibroma, aneurismal bone cyst, simple bone cyst, bone infarct, or chondroid tumours] on a plain radiograph [5].
Stages of evolution include:
Ischemia and infarction within the lesion cause the progression from stage I to stage III, which could be related to the rigid honeycomb structure of bone, fat cell expansion, and multiplication. These lesions may also cause bone resorption and expansion, whereas bone infarcts do not cause bone expansion. [6]
Clinical perspective
The majority of lipomas can be treated conservatively. The most common reasons for surgical intervention are suspicion or evidence of malignancy or the risk of pathological fracture. Cosmetic deformity or pain are two other indications. Curettage and packing with bone chips are common surgical treatments, similar to the one presented in this case. [7]
Imaging perspective
On CT, they appear as homogeneous encapsulated masses with low attenuation. All MRI sequences including the fat suppression sequence, show characteristic complete signal loss of the mass, revealing that the signal intensity of lipomas was consistent with that of subcutaneous fat [2]. They can cause mass effects on the adjacent neurovascular bundles if any. MRI is the imaging modality of choice if the patient is symptomatic [3].
Teaching points
As lipomas are the most common benign soft tissue tumours, it is important to evaluate their localization, extent, involvement of neurovascular bundle, and malignant transformation [Solid component and thick septae]. MRI is the best imaging modality for the characterization of the lesion. Evaluation of lipomas is necessary for a symptomatic patient to plan the treatment accordingly.
Written informed patient consent for publication has been obtained.
[1] Wu JS, Hochman MG. Soft-tissue tumors and tumorlike lesions: a systematic imaging approach. Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):297-316.
[2] Shu S, Yuan H, Kong X, Wang J, Wang J, Zheng C. The value of multimodality imaging in diagnosis and treatment of cardiac lipoma. BMC Medical Imaging. 2021 Dec;21(1):1-9.
[3] Matsumoto K, Hukuda S, Ishizawa M, Chano T, Okabe H. MRI findings in intramuscular lipomas. Skeletal radiology. 1999 Mar;28(3):145-52.
[4] Mannem RR, Mautz AP, Baynes KE, Zambrano EV, King DM. AIRP best cases in radiologic-pathologic correlation: intraosseous lipoma. RadioGraphics. 2012 Sep;32(5):1523-8.
[5] Milgram JW. Intraosseous lipomas. A clinicopathologic study of 66 cases. ClinOrthopRelat Res 1988;231:277 - 302.
[6] Foley WD, Mallisee TA, Hohenwalter MD, Wilson CR, Quiroz FA, Taylor AJ. Multiphase hepatic CT with a multirow detector CT scanner. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2000 Sep;175(3):679-85.
[7] Hashimoto K, Nishimura S, Kakinoki R, Akagi M. Aggressive intraosseous lipoma of the intermediate phalanges of the thumb. Molecular and Clinical Oncology. 2018 Jul 1;9(1):62-5.
URL: | https://eurorad.org/case/18265 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.18265 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.