Abdominal imaging
Case TypeClinical Case
Authors
Christina Bougia, Thomas Vadivoulis, Artemis Andrianopoulou, Persefoni Margariti
Patient39 years, female
A 39-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency department with acute and exacerbating pain in the hypogastrium following a jet ski crash. The woman also presented with rectal bleeding, with its onset just after the accident.
FAST ultrasound examination was performed, revealing the presence of extraluminal free air alongside the posterior wall of the urinary bladder on the left and in the area between the rectum, the vagina and the uterine cervix. A characteristic sonographic finding was the presence of multiple reverberation artefacts accompanied by “dirty shadowing”, which is pathognomonic for the presence of free extraluminal air. No associated solid organ contusion or subcapsular haematoma was detected. Additional sonographic findings included the presence of free fluid in the Douglas pouch with complex echogenicity. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed areas of wall discontinuity of the rectum, with the presence of extraluminal free air in the mesorectal fat, the rectouterine pouch, and the left perivesical area, most probably related to additional disruption of the mesorectal fascia. Haemorrhagic perirectal fluid collections and a small haematoma in the soft tissues of the pelvis and the perineum were also present. No solid organ contusion, laceration, hematoma (subcapsular or intraparenchymal) or bone fractures were identified. No free gas was recognised in the peritoneal cavity.
Rectal injuries as sequelae of blunt abdominal trauma are relatively rare. They are quite often attributed to the clinical difficulty in establishing an early diagnosis, with resulting high morbidity and mortality [1]. The rectum is the least frequently injured organ in trauma with an incidence of 0.1–0.5% [2]. Although CT is the mainstay imaging modality in the early evaluation of traumatic bowel laceration along with rigid rectoproctoscopy, early diagnosis can also be made via ultrasound. A highly specific sonographic finding is the presence of multiple reverberation artefacts identified extraluminally and accompanied by the characteristic sonographic “dirty shadow”, indicating the presence of free extraluminal air [3]. In traumatic bowel laceration, isolated retroperitoneal air is a quite uncommon finding and, typically, air is also seen in the peritoneal cavity [3]. However, if free air is identified in the lower pelvis, rectal injury should always be suspected [4]. The most specific CT findings of bowel wall injury include extraluminal presence of oral contrast medium, discrete bowel wall discontinuity, active bleeding related to mural injury and active extravasation of intravenous contrast into the bowel lumen [5]. Associated, less specific findings are segmental bowel wall thickening, bowel wall enhancement, free intraperitoneal fluid and retroperitoneal hematomas [1,5]. Bowel wall discontinuity is the definite and most specific CT finding in bowel perforation, but often it may not be visualised, as in the case of contained rupture [4,5]. Management principles for rectal injuries differ owing to the fact that the rectum comprises two different anatomic segments, the intra- and intraperitoneal rectum. The exclusion of free gas into the peritoneal cavity is crucial in order to decide the treatment strategy. Intraperitoneal rectal injuries are managed as colonic injuries, with small injuries primarily repaired and larger injuries resected. Extraperitoneal injuries are repaired primarily via trans-anal approach, if feasible, and otherwise are managed with proximal diverting colostomy alone [5]. In our case, a proximal diversion as a temporary loop colostomy was surgically conducted. The presence of retroperitoneal air should always raise suspicion for a perforated retroperitoneal viscus organ in the setting of blunt abdominal trauma and is a relatively specific sign of bowel perforation. In cases of rectal lacerations, using imaging to define which segments are involved is crucial for further surgical management [1,5]. The use of transabdominal ultrasonography has been minimally discussed in the literature and may be a promising tool in early and immediate diagnosis of rectal laceration in the context of trauma, under certain circumstances.
[1] Kim HC, Shin HC, Park SJ, Park SI, Kim HH, Bae WK, Kim IY, Jeong DS (2004) Traumatic bowel perforation: analysis of CT findings according to the perforation site and the elapsed time since accident. Clin Imaging 28(5):334-9. doi: 10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00244-4. (PMID: 15471664)
[2] Karadimos D, Aldridge O, Menon T (2019) Conservative management of a traumatic non-destructive grade II extraperitoneal rectal injury following motor vehicle collision. Trauma Case Rep 23:100224. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100224. (PMID: 31367668)
[3] Buttar S, Cooper D Jr, Olivieri P, Barca M, Drake AB, Ku M, Rose G, Siadecki SD, Saul T (2017) Air and its Sonographic Appearance: Understanding the Artifacts. J Emerg Med 53(2):241-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.01.054. (PMID: 28372830)
[4] Bondia JM, Anderson SW, Rhea JT, Soto JA (2009) Imaging colorectal trauma using 64-MDCT technology. Emerg Radiol 16(6):433-40. doi: 10.1007/s10140-009-0810-1. (PMID: 19396481)
[5] Anderson SW, Soto JA (2008) Anorectal trauma: the use of computed tomography scan in diagnosis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 29(6):472-82. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2008.10.004. (PMID: 19166043)
URL: | https://eurorad.org/case/18447 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.18447 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.