CECT scan of chest and abdomen
Abdominal imaging
Case TypeClinical Case
Authors
Vishal Goel
Patient59 years, female
A 59-year-old female presented with a history of generalised abdominal pain, abdominal distention and loss of appetite for the last 6 months. There was no significant history of bilateral lower limb oedema or respiratory distress. Clinical examination revealed a large, firm, non-tender lump in the epigastrium and umbilical region.
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan of chest and abdomen was done, showing a large heterogeneously enhancing solid lobulated mass in the retroperitoneum, predominantly on the right side. The inferior vena cava (IVC) was not visualised at the point of maximal contact between the IVC and the mass (imperceptible IVC sign) against L2–L5 vertebral bodies (Figure 1a) and superiorly evidence of IVC expansion with intraluminal tumoural extension (Figure 1b), suggesting tumour arising from infrarenal segment of IVC with superior intraluminal extension but not reaching up to hepatic veins.
There were multiple heterogeneous enhancing necrotic lesions of variable size in both lobes of liver (Figure 1c) and lung, with retroperitoneal, liver and lung lesions all showing increased uptake on PET scan (Figure 2).
IVC leiomyosarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumour of the IVC [1]. It grows extraluminally in approximately 62% of cases, followed by combined extra- and intraluminal growth in approximately 33% of cases and intraluminal in approximately 5% of cases [1].
Clinical Perspective
Middle aged females are most commonly affected [2]. Due to their non-specific signs and symptoms, like abdominal pain and distention, clinical diagnosis is usually delayed.
The location of the tumour within IVC decides the symptomatology, resectability and prognosis of these patients. Based on its location within the IVC, it has been divided into three segments.
The majority arise in Segment I (34%) or Segment II (42%) of the IVC; Segment III tumours are less common (24%) [1,2].
Imaging Perspective
Multiplanar computed tomography (CT) is ideal to delineate the true origin and extent of retroperitoneal masses. IVC leiomyosarcoma appears as a lobulated mass with heterogeneous contrast enhancement. Intraluminal extension dilates IVC, where enlargement of the vessel lumen and post-contrast enhancement of luminal filling defects favours tumour thrombus over bland thrombus [1,3].
Differentiating IVC leiomyosarcoma from primary retroperitoneal sarcoma is not always straightforward. Imperceptible caval lumen is a most useful sign for a retroperitoneal mass to be diagnosed as an IVC leiomyosarcoma with a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 75%. On the other hand, a negative embedded IVC sign (IVC compressed to the periphery of the mass and appearing crescentic) rules out IVC mass [4].
Common sites for its metastasis are the liver, lungs, lymph nodes and bones [5].
Outcome
Surgical resection is the mainstay treatment for these tumours. Our patient was given palliative chemo-radiotherapy as she already had metastatic disease at the time of presentation, using an adriamycin-ifosfamide regime; however, the patient soon expired. They usually have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 33% [6].
Take Home Message
Primary IVC leiomyosarcoma is a rare malignant tumour presenting with nonspecific symptoms. Multiplanar imaging with CT is the primary modality for its diagnosis, localisation and deciding the surgical management. These tumours generally have a poor prognosis with local recurrences and metastasis on follow up. Early diagnosis and aggressive surgical resection should be the aim for improving disease-free survival of such patients.
All patient data have been completely anonymised throughout the entire manuscript and related files.
[1] Ceyhan M, Danaci M, Elmali M, Ozmen Z (2007) Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava. Diagn Interv Radiol 13(3):140-3. (PMID: 17846988)
[2] Mingoli A, Feldhaus RJ, Cavallaro A, Stipa S (1991) Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: analysis and search of world literature on 141 patients and report of three new cases. J Vasc Surg 14(5):688-99. doi: 10.1067/mva.1991.30426. (PMID: 1942380)
[3] Monteagudo Cortecero J, Guirau Rubio MD, Payá Romá A (2015) Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: AIRP best cases in radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 35(2):616-20. doi: 10.1148/rg.352130105. (PMID: 25763742)
[4] Webb EM, Wang ZJ, Westphalen AC, Nakakura EK, Coakley FV, Yeh BM (2013) Can CT features differentiate between inferior vena cava leiomyosarcomas and primary retroperitoneal masses? AJR Am J Roentgenol 200(1):205-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7476. (PMID: 23255763)
[5] Lee HM, Jeong DS, Park PW, Kim WS, Sung K, Lee YT (2013) Surgical treatment for an invasive leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 46(5):373-6. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2013.46.5.373. (PMID: 24175275)
[6] Hollenbeck ST, Grobmyer SR, Kent KC, Brennan MF (2003) Surgical treatment and outcomes of patients with primary inferior vena cava leiomyosarcoma. J Am Coll Surg 197(4):575-9. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00433-2. (PMID: 14522326)
URL: | https://eurorad.org/case/18621 |
DOI: | 10.35100/eurorad/case.18621 |
ISSN: | 1563-4086 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.